Negotiation principles internationally

Many countries have set up open access policies and mandates over the past years. To put political strategies into practice, consortia around the world have started to negotiate transformative open access agreements replacing their former subscription licenses. Principles, guidelines, checklists, and recommendations have been developed locally and in cooperation with ESAC to guide the negotiations and implementation. This overview collects the ressources available in order to support the library and consortia community in developing common principles as well as implementation standards.

 

LIBER Five Principles for Negotiations with Publishers


LIBER, Europe’s leading association of research libraries, set up Five Principles for libraries to use when conducting Open Access negotiations with publishers:

 

Open Access 2020 – Expression of Interest


 

Open Access 2020FINAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT, 14th Berlin Open Access Conference


Participants from 37 nations and five continents, representing research performing and research funding institutions, libraries and government higher education associations and rectors’ conferences, associations of researchers and other open access initiatives gathered at the 14th Berlin Open Access Conference held 3-4 December 2018 in Berlin. They affirmed that there is a strong alignment among the approaches taken by OA2020, Plan S, the Jussieu Call and others to facilitate a full and complete transition to open access. The statement that follows represents the strong consensus of all of those represented at the meeting.

We are all committed to authors retaining their copyrights,
We are all committed to complete and immediate open access,
We are all committed to accelerating the progress of open access through transformative agreements that are temporary and transitional, with a shift to full open access within a very few years. These agreements should, at least initially, be cost-neutral, with the expectation that economic adjustments will follow as the markets transform.

Publishers are expected to work with all members of the global research community to effect complete and immediate open access according to this statement.

Go to OA2020

 

Nordic Countries – Nordic consortia open access commitments


Consortia from Europe’s nordic countries Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland have developed a joint checklist intended for the use of consortium or library staff negotiating open access agreements with publishers addressing the following principles:

 

Norway (UNIT)


Together with the press release of Norway’s Elsevier cancellation in March 2019, UNIT published their principles for publisher negotiations:

To ensure a successful transition to open access, the following guiding principles apply to all negotiations:

* Articles with corresponding authors from Norway shall be openly available at the time of publishing

* Publishing open access shall not increase total costs

* License agreements, costs and business models must be fully transparent

* Perpetual access to content published in subscription journals must be granted

* Agreements should demonstrate a move towards models where costs are related to the volume of Norwegian article output

In July 2018 Universities Norway (UHR) gave their full support to Unit’s negotiation principles and nominated representatives from the rectorates at the universities of Oslo and Bergen to participate in the negotiations with Elsevier.

 

Southern European Libraries Link (SELL) – Statement


In May 2018, consortia from Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Greece, Turkey, and Israel, members of the SELL group, reiterate their full support to open access and their commitment to speed up the transition.  Sharing the analysis that “there is currently enough money in the (publishing) system” and that the money spent on subscriptions is now to be considered as an investment to support open access, SELL consortia agree on the following principles:

 

The Netherlands – Five Pillars of Open Access


The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) developed a strategy comprising five pillars of open access. Negotiations with publishers on open access agreements is one key element of the five-pillars-strategy. As a principle, the Dutch universities want to transform their former subscription contracts to open access agreements at no extra costs.

Read more about the Dutch five pillars of open access

The Netherlands – UKB Checklist Big Deals and Open Access clauses


In March 2017, UKB working group launched a checklist putting together requirements and clauses for open access agreements.

Download the checklist here

 

USA – California Call to Action


On June 2018, the University of California’s Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee (SLASIAC) issued a Call to Action in which they announced their intent to embark on a new phase of activity in journal negotiations focused on open access to research.

 

 

China


OA2020 Mainland China Signatory Libraries Discussed a Response To Plan S Guidance on Implementation

Mainland China signatory libraries of OA2020 Initiative Expression of Interest held a meeting March 26, 2019, at the National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, in Beijing, to discuss a response to Plan S Guidance on Implementation.

The followings are the discussed response to Plan S Guidance on Implementation:

 

Japan – ~JUSTICE OA2020 Roadmap~


JUSTICE (Japan Alliance of University Library Consortia for E-Resource)

Transformation from subscription model toward OA publishing model (PDF)

 

UK – JISC Collection’s requirements for transformative Open Access agreements


UK academic institutions and sector agencies, working alongside Jisc Collections, have established the requirements for 2019 which set out the measures required to accelerate open access in the UK:

 

Ireland


IReL principles for Open Accesspublisher agreements from 2020

 

Switzerland – Negotiating strategy of swissuniversities


Switzerland’s rectors’ conference of higher education institutions, swissuniversities, are revising the national contracts on access to academic journals with the major publishers Springer Nature, Wiley and Elsevier to include open access components. The negotiating strategy is based on an approach already used in numerous other European countries, e.g. Germany, and corresponds to the general principles of the European network LIBER. The strategy foresees that Switzerland expressly heeds its demands regarding licensing to achieve appropriate, transparent pricing for access to academic information and greater accessibility to publications in accordance with the open access standard.

 

Austria – Recommendations for the Transition to Open Access in Austria


In 2016, an expert Group “National Strategy” of the Open Access Network Austria (OANA) and Universities Austria (uniko) published 16 recommendations designed to bring open access to a large part of all scholarly publication activity in Austria by 2025. Regarding the negotiation of publisher agreements, the recommendations state:

 

Hungary – Principles for transitional Open Access agreements under the framework of Electronic Information Service National Programme


On its meeting on the 14th of December 2018, EISZ Programme Board, governing council of EISZ National Programme, representing the participating institutions and the financing authorities, made the following declaration:

 

Germany – Project DEAL


The goal of Project DEAL is to conclude nationwide licensing agreements for the entire portfolio of electronic journals (E-journals) from major academic publishers. The underlying principles of the agreements to be negotiated are adequate pricing (within the range of the current spending level) and open access to the German article output (CC-BY).

Read more about project DEAL

 

Germany – Positions on creating an Open Access publication market which is scholarly adequate


In 2015, a working group of the German Alliance of Science Oarganisations published a position paper aiming at improving transparency and sustainability in the field of scholarly publishing and its transition to open access. It is directed at scholarly institutions dealing with aspects of Open Access publishing, and bundles and evaluates the requirements for contracts based on the publication cost model. .

Read the full position paper