oxf2023czelib

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Agreement ID oxf2023czelib
Agreement labeling CzechELib STANDARD LICENSE AGREEMENT
Has the agreement been disclosed and published? Yes
URL https://smlouvy.gov.cz/smlouva/23097881
Agreement period 01/01/2023 – 12/31/2025
Consortia / Institution CzechELib
Country Czech Republic
SIZE

Approximate range of annual corresponding author publications

90
Comments on size/article output Unlimited trough the entire Full collection, since a forced upgrade to Full collection was exercised for all members
COSTS

How do the costs of the agreement relate to previous subscription-only agreements with the publisher?

Cost increase
Comments on cost development Caused mainly by the forced upgrade to the Full collection
FINANCIAL SHIFT

Transformative agreements vary by their transformative mechanisms, meaning the way in which financing is shifted from the subscription side to open access publishing. What are the characteristics of this agreement to this regard?

Subscriptions partly converted to OA publishing fees
RISK SHARING

How do entitlements for open access publishing correlate to the anticipated article output? Which mechanisms for risk sharing have been agreed in cases of exceeding or not reaching the number of OA publishing entitlements?

There is no limit for the numbers of articles covered (unlimited)
OA COVERAGE

Are all journals relevant to your affiliated authors (in which you expect them to publish) eligible for OA publishing under the agreement?

Yes
Are fully open access journals covered by the agreement? Yes
OA LICENSE CC-BY preference, exceptions allowed
ARTICLE TYPES
Original research articles
Review articles
Brief report, or case report
ACCESS COSTS

What is the approximate share of access related costs of the overall agreement?

20%-50%
Comments on access costs Share stated in the agreement, as well as on the invoice data (different VATs for Read and Publish parts)
ACCESS COVERAGE

Are all read relevant journals covered by the agreement?

Yes
PERPETUAL ACCESS RIGHTS Yes
WORKFLOW ASSESSMENT Too early to assess
Comments on workflows Publisher was supposed to transfer to SciPris soon, where the institutions should approve the articles of their authors. However, it is not yet done and the workflow is so far solely on the side of the publisher.
Request contact to the licensee contact [at] esac-initiative [dot] org