acm2025fct

GENERAL INFORMATION
Publisher Association for Computing Machinery
Agreement ID acm2025fct
Agreement labeling ACM Open
Is the agreement document publicly available? No
Agreement period 9/30/2025 – 12/31/2027
Consortia / Institution b-on / FCT
Country Portugal
COST
How do the costs of the agreement relate to the previous agreement with the publisher? Cost decrease
Comments on cost development Value adjusted to actual publishing institutions and output
Describe how the cost model has changed from the previous agreement (e.g., move from subscription to R&P / from capped to uncapped / from single APC payments to flat fee, etc.) New model, fully based on output
PUBLISHING-RELATED TERMS
Publication output

What is the approximate number of annual corresponding author publications from your institution/consortium with the publisher (in closed, hybrid and fully OA journals)?

125
Is the agreement’s provision for OA publishing capped (e.g., limited to a specific number of articles per year) or uncapped? Uncapped
Coverage

Are all journals relevant to your affiliated authors (i.e., journals in which you expect them to publish) eligible for OA publishing under the agreement?

Yes
Are APC-based full open access journals covered by the agreement? Yes, alongside hybrid titles
Are journals operating under other business models (S2O, Diamond OA, etc.) covered by the agreement? No
Article types

Eligible article types

Original research articles, Review articles, Interview, Note, Short Paper, Survey, Technical Note, Tutorial
Risk sharing

What risk-sharing mechanisms exist in cases of exceeding or not reaching the anticipated number of OA publications under the agreement?

No risk-sharing mechanism
Comments on publishing-related terms Unlimited OA publishing
READ ACCESS-RELATED TERMS
Coverage of read access

If the agreement includes read access to subscription content, is access to all relevant journals required by your users covered by the agreement?

Yes
Perpetual access

If the agreement includes read access to subscription content, are perpetual access (post cancellation/termination) rights included?

Yes
If perpetual access rights to subscription content is included, are there associated fees (for continued access to the platform, local hosting, data delivery, etc.)? No
OA WORKFLOW
Author workflow and verification

The date for articles’ eligibility is based on:

Acceptance date
Describe the mechanisms used by the publisher for matching authors with an eligible institution: Email domain verification
How do consortia or institutions verify author eligibility and approve OA funding? No process in place (publications are deemed automatically verified/approved)
Does the agreement include mechanisms to correct mistakenly approved, missed, or not approved publications (e.g., retrospective OA conversion of closed articles or refunding paid APCs)? No
Does the publisher’s reporting on publications satisfy the needs of your institution (frequency, metadata fields, data quality, etc.)? Yes
Comments on additional publication fees No charges will be applied to the authors in relation to the submission of an article to be published in open access through the green route, whereby the AAM is deposited in open access repositories. Page charges not discussed.
How would you assess the practical implementation of the agreement? Ok
PUBLISHING LICENSES
Author’s licenses

Open access license types included

CC BY preference, exceptions allowed
Has the author workflow been customized to direct authors to a certain license (e.g., by making the option for CC BY the preselected default)? Yes
If the agreement covers licenses more restrictive than CC BY, do the License to Publish agreements (LtPs) offered to authors differ from the publisher’s standard LtP? Not part of the negotiations/not discussed
In addition to the OA publishing provision, does the agreement include mechanisms to make author accepted manuscripts open access? Yes
OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND COMMENTS
Please share your overall assessment of this agreement with the community. Were negotiation goals (such as open access, cost development, etc.) reached? Which elements would have to be adjusted in future agreements? The terms of the agreement are favourable but more effort must be done to improve CC BY license selection, as well as a more reliable triggering of OA workflow in order to improve compliance

Request contact to the licensee: contact@esac-initiative.org